Analogy Makes Proofs Feasible
نویسنده
چکیده
Many mathematical proofs are hard to generate for humans and even harder for automated theorem provers. Classical techniques of automated theorem proving involve the application of basic rules, of built-in special procedures, or of tactics. Melis (Melis 1993) introduced a new method for analogical reasoning in automated theorem proving. In this paper we show how the derivational analogy replay method is related and extended to encompass analogy-driven proof plan construction. The method is evaluated by showing the proof plan generation of the Pumping Lemma for context free languages derived by analogy with the proof plan of the Pumping Lemma for regular languages. This is an impressive evaluation test for the analogical reasoning method applied to automated theorem proving, as the automated proof of this Pumping Lemma is beyond the capabilities of any of the current automated theorem provers.
منابع مشابه
Analogy Makes Proofs
Many mathematical proofs are hard to generate for humans and even harder for automated theorem provers. Classical techniques of automated theorem proving involve the application of basic rules, of built-in special procedures, or of tactics. Melis (Melis 1993) introduced a new method for analogical reasoning in automated theorem proving. In this paper we show how the derivational analogy replay ...
متن کاملUsing Abductive Recovery of Failed Proofs for Problem Solving by Analogy
We propose a solution to problem solving by analogy which is an alternative to Carbonell's transformational analogy. Given a plan that succeeds for the base, we apply the plan to the target and propose to correct its failures by an abductive recovery mechanism inspired from abductive recovery from failed proofs.
متن کاملPartial Matching for Analogy Discovery in Proofs and Counter-Examples
The problem of analogy in theorem proving has been studied for several years now (see 5, 10, 12] for example). Those works restrict the use of analogy to proofs, disregarding the possibilities of using analogy also for counterexamples construction. Moreover, they deal with the problem of proving a new theorem once an appropriate source theorem has been provided as a guideline. We overcome these...
متن کاملBuilding Proofs or Counterexamples by Analogy in a Resoluton Framework
Taking an extension of resolution as a base calculus (though its principles are applicable to other calculi) for searching proofs (refuta-tions) and counterexamples (models), we introduce a new method able to nd refutations and also models by analogy with refutations and models in a knowledge base. The source objects for the analogy process are generalizations of the refutations (models). They ...
متن کاملBuilding Proofs by Analogy via the Curry-Horward Isomorphism
We present a formal method for building proofs by analogy and its implementation as a proof tactic for the NuPRL proof development system. The Curry-Howard Isomorphism is used to represent proof constructions in a term-functional language and to specify analogies by transformation rules on these terms. The method has the advantage to admit complete formalization and to make use of well-known te...
متن کامل